A recent Workplace Relations Commission decision provides an important lesson for employers: a constructive dismissal claim does not always arise from one major event.
Sometimes, a series of smaller workplace issues can combine to damage trust and confidence to the point where an employee believes they have no reasonable option but to resign.
A former tutor at a youth fashion academy was awarded €1,000 after the WRC upheld what it described as a “very marginal” constructive dismissal complaint.
Although no single event was sufficient to establish constructive dismissal on its own, the adjudicator found that the cumulative effect of the issues raised was persuasive.
For employers, the case demonstrates why workplace concerns should be addressed early, clearly and consistently before they develop into a wider breakdown in the employment relationship.
The employee worked as a sewing tutor at an organisation providing fashion classes and camps for children and teenagers.
She raised a number of concerns during her employment, including:
The employee claimed she had repeatedly raised safety concerns with management, including concerns relating to extension leads, the suitability of sewing equipment for smaller children and the availability of appropriately trained staff.
She also described an incident in which a child’s finger was injured by a sewing-machine needle.
The employer disputed the employee’s claims and maintained that it had not been made aware of some of the alleged concerns until later correspondence.
The employee initially submitted her resignation in September 2024.
She later agreed to withdraw it following discussions which she understood included an increase in her hourly rate from €15 to €17.
However, the company subsequently wrote to her describing the increase as a suggestion rather than a confirmed agreement.
The employee considered this a breach of trust and informed the employer that she would not be returning to work.
The employer maintained that it had not refused the proposed increase, but that the employee’s grievances first needed to be addressed.
The adjudicator upheld the employee’s complaint, although the finding of constructive dismissal was described as “very marginal”.
Importantly, the WRC did not find that any single incident was sufficient to justify resignation.
Instead, the adjudicator considered the cumulative effect of the difficulties raised by the employee.
The breakdown in communication surrounding the proposed pay increase was identified as particularly significant. It appeared to have caused a major loss of trust from which the employment relationship did not recover.
The employee was awarded €1,000, approximately equivalent to two months’ pay.
Constructive dismissal arises where an employee resigns because of the employer’s conduct.
To succeed, an employee will generally need to establish either that:
The legal threshold is high. An employee cannot normally succeed simply because the workplace was difficult, stressful or unpleasant.
However, several unresolved issues may collectively become serious enough to support a claim.
The relatively modest award should not distract from the broader employer lesson.
The case shows how workplace risk can accumulate where concerns are not addressed through a clear and trusted process.
The dispute involved several overlapping issues:
Individually, each issue may have been manageable. Together, they contributed to the end of the employment relationship.
Where an employee raises a health and safety concern, employers should:
This does not mean every allegation must be accepted. It means each concern should receive a structured and documented response.
Where children, vulnerable people or workplace machinery are involved, the importance of clear safety procedures is even greater.
Workplace complaints frequently begin as conversations with a manager.
If the issue is not resolved, the employee should be directed towards a clear grievance process.
Employers should avoid situations where:
A short written acknowledgement and follow-up meeting can prevent significant disagreement later.
The apparent misunderstanding over the proposed hourly rate was central to the breakdown in trust.
Any change to pay should be confirmed in writing and should clearly state:
Words such as “proposal”, “suggestion”, “agreement” and “approval” should not be used interchangeably.
An employee should not be left believing a pay increase has been agreed when management considers it subject to further discussion.
Employers often assess complaints separately.
One issue may involve pay, another may involve a colleague, and another may involve safety. Each manager may see only one part of the situation.
The WRC may consider the overall pattern.
Employers should therefore step back and ask whether repeated unresolved issues are contributing to a wider breakdown in trust and confidence.
A resignation made during a workplace dispute should not always be accepted immediately without further engagement.
Depending on the circumstances, the employer may consider:
An employer is not always required to persuade an employee to remain. However, a measured response may prevent an avoidable constructive dismissal claim.
High staff turnover, unclear responsibilities, inadequate training and strained communication may initially appear to be operational issues.
Left unmanaged, they can contribute to:
Early intervention is usually less costly than defending a claim after the relationship has broken down.
Employers can reduce constructive dismissal risk by:
This decision demonstrates that constructive dismissal is not always based on a dramatic final incident.
A series of misunderstandings, unresolved concerns and unclear management communications can gradually undermine the employment relationship.
The strongest protection for employers is not simply having policies in place. It is showing that those policies were actually used, concerns were taken seriously and agreements were communicated clearly.
Ormonde Solicitors advises employers on:
Addressing workplace concerns early can protect trust, support management and reduce the likelihood of disputes escalating.
📞 Contact us today for confidential guidance.
Disclaimer: This article is for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Schedule a consultation with our team to discuss your legal needs and explore your options with confidence.
Trust our experienced solicitors to manage your case with precision and care, keeping you informed at every step.
Let us help you secure the best possible result—whether it’s a fair settlement, legal resolution, or peace of mind.
We are honoured to share that Ormonde Solicitors & Employment Matters has been named the Business All-Star Labour & Employment Law Practice of the Year 2025 & 2026. This prestigious recognition from the All-Ireland Business Foundation reflects our ongoing commitment to fair workplace practices and expert legal representation, led by the dedication and vision of Sean Ormonde. We are deeply grateful to our loyal clients, dedicated team, and the AIBF for their continued support and trust.