Skip to main content

Ormonde Solicitors

€76,000 Award After Forced Retirement: Why Employers Must Be Careful With Mandatory Retirement

A recent Workplace Relations Commission decision highlights the serious risks employers face when attempting to rely on retirement age without a clear, lawful and consistently applied policy.

A long-serving seamstress was awarded over €76,000 after the WRC found she had been unfairly dismissed when her employer sought to end her employment based on an alleged mandatory retirement age.

The decision is a significant reminder for employers that retirement cannot be treated as an informal or automatic exit route.

Background to the Case

The employee had worked for approximately 17 years in an alterations shop in Cork. She was 67 years old and had previously worked part-time between two roles.

In 2023, she gave up another job opportunity to increase her working week with her employer. However, the following year, she was told her hours would be reduced and that the business intended to bring in other workers.

The employee’s employment was later terminated in December 2024. The employer relied on what was described as an alleged mandatory retirement age.

The employee told the WRC she wanted to continue working for as long as her health allowed and said she had lost out on the opportunity to take up full-time work elsewhere because of how the matter was handled.

What the WRC Found

The WRC upheld the employee’s unfair dismissal complaint.

Adjudicator Emile Daly found that:

  • There was no mandatory retirement age in operation in the business.
  • The employee had been an excellent and long-standing worker.
  • She had been treated “exceptionally shabbily”.
  • The employer’s conduct caused her to lose out on a full-time job opportunity elsewhere.

The WRC awarded:

  • €67,000 for unfair dismissal.
  • Further compensation for breaches of employment rights legislation, including payment of wages, written terms and working time obligations.

The total award came to €76,491.

Why This Case Matters for Employers

This decision shows that employers cannot rely on retirement as a convenient way to remove an older employee unless they can clearly demonstrate that the retirement arrangement is lawful.

Mandatory retirement is not automatically unlawful, but it must be properly structured.

Employers should be able to show:

  • A clear contractual retirement age;
  • An objective justification for that retirement age;
  • Consistency in how the rule is applied;
  • Fair procedures before employment ends.

Where these elements are missing, employers may face claims for unfair dismissal and potentially age discrimination.

Key Employer Lessons

1. Retirement Age Must Be Clear

Employers should not assume that an employee can simply be retired because they have reached a certain age.

If a retirement age exists, it should be clearly set out in:

  • The employment contract;
  • The staff handbook;
  • Workplace policies;
  • Retirement procedures.

In this case, the WRC found that no mandatory retirement age was actually in operation.


2. Mandatory Retirement Must Be Objectively Justified

Even where a retirement age is written into a contract, employers must be able to justify it.

Possible justifications may include workforce planning, succession planning, health and safety requirements, or creating opportunities for progression.

However, the justification must be real, proportionate and capable of being defended.


3. Long-Service Employees Require Careful Handling

This case involved an employee with approximately 17 years’ service.

The WRC placed weight on the fact that she was a long-standing and valued employee who had lost another job opportunity due to her employer’s conduct.

Employers should be particularly careful when making decisions affecting long-serving employees, as the financial and reputational consequences can be significant.


4. Reducing Hours Before Termination Can Increase Risk

The employee was first told her working week would be reduced before her employment was later terminated.

Changes to hours, duties or working patterns should be handled through proper consultation.

Unilateral changes can give rise to additional claims, including payment of wages and unfair dismissal complaints.


5. Employment Rights Compliance Still Matters

Alongside the unfair dismissal award, the WRC also made further awards for breaches of:

  • The Payment of Wages Act 1991;
  • The Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1994;
  • The Organisation of Working Time Act 1997.

This shows how one poorly handled termination can expose employers to multiple claims at once.

Practical Steps for Employers

Before relying on retirement as a reason to end employment, employers should:

  • Review contracts and handbooks;
  • Confirm whether a retirement age is clearly documented;
  • Assess whether the retirement age is objectively justified;
  • Consult with the employee in advance;
  • Consider any request to work beyond retirement age;
  • Document the decision-making process;
  • Seek legal advice before issuing notice.

A vague or informal understanding will not be enough.

The Bigger Message for Employers

This decision reinforces a simple but important principle:

Retirement should be managed as a formal employment law process, not an assumption.

Where employers rely on unclear policies or fail to communicate properly, they risk significant compensation awards.

A properly drafted retirement policy, supported by fair procedures, can help businesses manage workforce planning while reducing legal exposure.

How Ormonde Solicitors Can Help

At Ormonde Solicitors, we advise employers on:

  • Retirement policies;
  • Contracts of employment;
  • Age discrimination risks;
  • Redundancy and workforce planning;
  • Unfair dismissal claims;
  • WRC representation.

Early advice can help employers manage sensitive exits lawfully and reduce the risk of costly disputes.

📞 Contact us today for confidential guidance.

Disclaimer: This article is for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Ready to Take
the Next Step?

Book a Call

Schedule a consultation with our team to discuss your legal needs and explore your options with confidence.

We Handle the Details

Trust our experienced solicitors to manage your case with precision and care, keeping you informed at every step.

Achieve Your Desired Outcome

Let us help you secure the best possible result—whether it’s a fair settlement, legal resolution, or peace of mind.

Arrange a Call Back or Send a Query

    We are honoured to share that Ormonde Solicitors & Employment Matters has been named the Business All-Star Labour & Employment Law Practice of the Year 2025 & 2026. This prestigious recognition from the All-Ireland Business Foundation reflects our ongoing commitment to fair workplace practices and expert legal representation, led by the dedication and vision of Sean Ormonde. We are deeply grateful to our loyal clients, dedicated team, and the AIBF for their continued support and trust.