Skip to main content

Ormonde Solicitors

WRC Recommends €10,000 After Employer Failed to Properly Address Work-Related Stress

A recent Workplace Relations Commission recommendation highlights a critical lesson for employers: workplace policies offer little protection if management does not follow them when an employee needs support.

A serving Garda who reported suffering from medically certified work-related stress was recommended €10,000 in compensation after the WRC identified a sequence of procedural failures in how her case was handled.

The WRC found that the problem was not one isolated administrative mistake. Instead, delays, incomplete investigations and failures to respond through established internal processes prolonged the worker’s uncertainty, financial loss and stress.

For employers, the wider message is clear:

When work-related stress is reported, the response must be timely, structured and consistent with the organisation’s own procedures.

Background to the case

The worker had raised concerns about the mental impact of her work and was referred to the organisation’s Chief Medical Officer in 2020.

However, no appointment was arranged.

When she was later certified unfit for duty due to work-related stress, the structured investigation required under the applicable internal directive was not completed as intended.

According to the WRC findings, a management view was formed without:

  • Completing the required investigation;
  • Compiling a full investigative record;
  • Properly applying the relevant procedure.

The worker later challenged the classification and handling of her absence.

After obtaining further information through a Freedom of Information request, she submitted an appeal in April 2024. That appeal reportedly remained unanswered for more than a year.

She also attempted to use an internal dispute-resolution procedure, but management declined to engage through that framework.

The WRC found that the worker was ultimately left with no meaningful alternative other than referring the dispute externally.

What the WRC Found

The WRC criticised the employer’s failure to follow procedures that were already in place.

The failures identified included:

  • Not arranging the original medical referral;
  • Failing to conduct a complete investigation;
  • Reaching conclusions without a full evidential record;
  • Not following central management directions;
  • Leaving an appeal unanswered for an extended period;
  • Declining to engage with the internal dispute-resolution process.

The WRC found that these failures caused significant consequences for the worker, including financial loss, prolonged uncertainty and additional stress while she was already dealing with a medically certified condition.

It recommended that the organisation:

  • Address the sick-leave issues identified within 42 days; and
  • Pay the worker €10,000 in compensation for the failure to process her application and grievances promptly.

Why Work-Related Stress Requires a Formal Response

Work-related stress is stress caused or made worse by work. The Health and Safety Authority recommends that employers use structured and collaborative methods to identify and manage stress-related risks.

Employers also have a general statutory duty, so far as is reasonably practicable, to protect employees’ safety, health and welfare at work. The HSA confirms that this includes assessing known psychosocial hazards that may contribute to mental ill-health.

An employer does not need to accept every assertion that work caused an illness. However, once the concern is raised, it should be assessed through a fair, evidence-based process.

Key Lessons for Employers

1. A Policy Must Be Followed in Practice

Having a detailed absence, occupational-health or injury-at-work policy is not enough.

Employers must ensure that managers:

  • Know when the policy applies;
  • Understand which steps are mandatory;
  • Complete those steps within reasonable timeframes;
  • Keep proper records.

Where a policy promises an investigation, referral or appeal, failing to provide it may significantly weaken the employer’s position.

2. Medical Referrals Must Be Progressed Promptly

Referring an employee to occupational health or another medical service is only the first step.

The employer should:

  • Arrange the appointment;
  • Confirm the questions requiring medical input;
  • Follow up where delays arise;
  • Explain the process to the employee;
  • Record any interim measures.

A referral that is made but never progressed may leave the employee unsupported and the employer without the evidence needed to make a fair decision.

3. Investigate the Cause, Not Just the Absence

When an employee is certified as suffering from work-related stress, the employer should not treat the matter solely as an attendance-management issue.

The investigation may need to consider:

  • Workload and working hours;
  • Role clarity;
  • Management conduct;
  • Workplace relationships;
  • Exposure to traumatic or sensitive material;
  • Organisational changes;
  • Available supports.

The purpose is not to determine whether the employee is “right” or “wrong” at the outset. It is to establish what occurred and whether workplace measures are required.

4. Keep a Complete Investigative Record

The WRC criticised the formation of a management view without a complete investigation or record.

Employers should document:

  • The concerns raised;
  • Medical information received;
  • Meetings held;
  • Evidence considered;
  • Conclusions reached;
  • Reasons for the decision;
  • Supports or adjustments offered.

A decision unsupported by records can appear arbitrary, even where managers believe they acted reasonably.

5. Appeals and Grievances Cannot Be Left Unanswered

The employee’s appeal reportedly remained unanswered for more than a year.

The WRC Code of Practice promotes fair and effective grievance procedures, while its employee guidance states that such procedures should be written, accessible and understood by management.

An appeal or grievance should be:

  • Acknowledged promptly;
  • Assigned to an appropriate decision-maker;
  • Investigated within a reasonable timeframe;
  • Concluded with a written response.

Where delays are unavoidable, the employee should receive updates rather than silence.

6. Local Managers Must Follow Organisation-Wide Directions

Large organisations often have central HR policies but rely on local managers to apply them.

This creates risk where local practice differs from the organisation’s formal procedure.

Employers should ensure:

  • Managers receive regular training;
  • HR has oversight of sensitive cases;
  • Deviations from policy require approval;
  • Unresolved cases are escalated.

A policy cannot protect an organisation if individual managers are permitted to disregard it.

7. Delay Can Compound the Original Harm

Administrative delay is not always neutral.

Where an employee is already suffering from work-related stress, prolonged uncertainty can:

  • Worsen the employee’s condition;
  • Increase financial loss;
  • undermine confidence in internal supports;
  • Make resolution more difficult;
  • Increase legal and reputational exposure.

Prompt communication can be as important as the eventual outcome.

A Practical Employer Response Framework

When work-related stress is reported, employers should follow a structured process.

Receive

Acknowledge the concern and identify whether immediate health or safety measures are needed.

Refer

Obtain appropriate occupational-health or medical advice without unnecessary delay.

Investigate

Examine the reported workplace causes through a fair and impartial process.

Assess

Consider workplace risks, temporary supports and possible adjustments.

Communicate

Keep the employee informed and explain decisions clearly.

Review

Monitor the arrangements and respond promptly to any grievance or appeal.

The Wider Message for Employers

The strongest employer lesson from this case is not simply about stress-related absence.

It is about procedural trust.

When an employee uses an organisation’s internal systems, they should receive a timely and meaningful response. Failing to follow those systems can add to the employee’s distress and transform a manageable workplace issue into a formal WRC dispute.

Policies must operate in practice—not just exist on paper.

How Ormonde Solicitors can help

Ormonde Solicitors advises employers on:

  • Work-related stress and absence management;
  • Occupational-health referrals;
  • Workplace investigations;
  • Grievance and appeal procedures;
  • Psychosocial risk management;
  • Employment policies;
  • WRC disputes and representation.

Early advice can help employers respond fairly while protecting employee welfare and organisational interests.

This article is provided for general information and does not constitute legal advice.

📞 Contact us today for confidential guidance.

Disclaimer: This article is for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Ready to Take
the Next Step?

Book a Call

Schedule a consultation with our team to discuss your legal needs and explore your options with confidence.

We Handle the Details

Trust our experienced solicitors to manage your case with precision and care, keeping you informed at every step.

Achieve Your Desired Outcome

Let us help you secure the best possible result—whether it’s a fair settlement, legal resolution, or peace of mind.

Arrange a Call Back or Send a Query

    We are honoured to share that Ormonde Solicitors & Employment Matters has been named the Business All-Star Labour & Employment Law Practice of the Year 2025 & 2026. This prestigious recognition from the All-Ireland Business Foundation reflects our ongoing commitment to fair workplace practices and expert legal representation, led by the dedication and vision of Sean Ormonde. We are deeply grateful to our loyal clients, dedicated team, and the AIBF for their continued support and trust.